BookBrowse Reviews Kent State by Brian VanDeMark

BookBrowse:

A new account of the 1970 Kent State University shootings provides fresh insights into and surprising revelations of a shocking moment in American history.

This review is available to non-members for a limited time. For access to our digital magazine, free books,and other benefits, become a member today.

On May 4th, 1970, four Kent State University students were shot and killed and nine wounded by members of the Ohio National Guard during a campus standoff. In Brian VanDeMark's stunning new study, Kent State: An American Tragedy, this "spasm of violence" receives a long overdue analysis essential to grappling with the incident's impact on America's psyche.

VanDeMark outlines early on why he felt this book was necessary: the Kent State shootings created "two competing narratives" that vilified either the student Vietnam War protesters or the Ohio National Guard for the tragedy that unfolded that day in northeast Ohio. VanDeMark sets out to tell the story from multiple perspectives, "without taking sides," using previously untapped archival documents and interviews with those who were there. The result is a cogent, clear-eyed, and almost minute-to-minute account of the chaos that erupted when young people on both sides of an American cultural divide squared off on the quad of Kent State.

The book begins with a snapshot of "the divided America of 1970" and how it came to be that way. American soldiers had entered Vietnam in the mid-1960s under the Kennedy administration and the war had expanded under Johnson, leading to increasing anti-war protests among the country's college youth. In December 1969, the first draft lottery since WWII was held; and a few months later, in late April 1970, Nixon announced he would send American troops into Cambodia for a limited incursion, which inflamed college students across the country, especially eligible males, who felt their nonviolence protests availed them nothing. Over this time, Kent State, like other colleges, had evolved from "quiet provincialism" into a hotbed of anti-war activism.

Kent State then goes into the events of the three days leading up to the shooting (May 1st through May 3rd) as seen and experienced by both student protestors and several Ohio National Guardsmen. After students set fire to the Kent State ROTC building, "a symbol of the military-industrial complex they despised and a constant reminder of the war in Vietnam they hated," the Guard was called out by the mayor, who felt the Kent police force was not equipped to deal with the growing unrest. The Guardsmen were mostly in their twenties, and many were sympathetic to the protestors; according to VanDeMark, many had joined the Guard to avoid the draft. "They saw themselves as reluctant participants," VanDeMark writes, but students saw them far differently; some protestors hurled verbal epithets at them, as well as rocks and debris.

May 4th, the "tragic day," is exhaustively covered with nerve-shredding tension as VanDeMark describes the chaos and confusion that swirled around the Guard regiments (led by General Robert Canterbury, whose incompetence and dismal leadership jumps off the page). In answer to the historical question surrounding the Kent State shooting of why the National Guard started firing on protestors who were unarmed and far away, VanDeMark posits that no one gave a command to fire, and that the shooting can be traced to a warning shot by an enlisted man, who shares his story for the first time in this book. The narrative is as gripping as it is comprehensive.

VanDeMark also chronicles the aftermath of the shooting, focusing on the psychological and emotional trauma suffered by the student survivors, the Ohio soldiers, and the families of those killed. He includes vivid and sensitive portraits of the thirteen students who were shot and killed or wounded, and shows how the lives of the survivors were changed forever. He also liberally documents the cold-hearted reactions of locals after the shooting, exploring the "town-and-gown" tension in Kent that bordered on hatred and left the townspeople blaming the students for the unrest. By gathering all of these perspectives, Kent State eschews simplified narratives of the tragedy that unfolded in 1970.

This review was originally published in The BookBrowse Review in September 2024, and has been updated for the January 2026 edition. Click here to go to this issue.