Understanding and Countering Science Denial: Background information when reading The Workshop and the World

Summary |  Excerpt |  Reviews |  Beyond the Book |  Readalikes |  Genres & Themes |  Author Bio

The Workshop and the World

What Ten Thinkers Can Teach Us About Science and Authority

by Robert P. Crease

The Workshop and the World by Robert P. Crease X
The Workshop and the World by Robert P. Crease
  • Critics' Opinion:

    Readers' Opinion:

     Not Yet Rated
  • Published:
    Mar 2019, 272 pages


  • Rate this book

Book Reviewed by:
Chris Fredrick
Buy This Book

About this Book

Understanding and Countering Science Denial

This article relates to The Workshop and the World

Print Review

According to Robert P. Crease, science denial is a personal rejection of only those specific scientific findings that conflict with an individual's political, economic or personal/religious beliefs. The Workshop and the World by Robert P. Crease looks at science denial throughout history and offers a synthesis that outlines: 1) the characteristics of scientific study that make it vulnerable to denial, and 2) better rhetorical tactics for countering this denial.

Science denial isn't simply about a few bad actors who are politically, financially or philosophically motivated. It has a deeper dynamic. The same characteristics that make coordinated scientific study an engine for innovation and progress also make it vulnerable to repudiation. Crease outlines six of these vulnerabilities, including the following:

  • It's a collective. Scientific research is a coordinated and collective effort, as was envisioned by the early scientific mathematicians and philosophers. That collective structure allows for new discoveries to challenge and build upon previous knowledge. However, being collective also means being institutional and bureaucratic. Those institutions have internal politics that can shape how scientific findings are presented. This characteristic enables science deniers to say things like: "Scientists have hidden agendas," "It's a hoax," or, "It's a conspiracy."
  • It's technical and abstract. Science, by its very nature, is highly complex. Scientists have the necessary expertise to understand a study's raw data and transform it into meaningful findings that relate to the world. Being highly technical and abstract, though, means it isn't accessible to an average citizen or politician lacking that expertise. This characteristic enables the science deniers who say things like: "Scientists are their own special interest group," or "Science is an abstract practice with little relevance to the concrete world of politics."
  • It's open-ended. Science is a collection of studies that is always changing; early findings can be and often are challenged with new experiments, and new data is constantly being produced. The overall trend is that the body of factual knowledge is always growing, and this open-ended quality suggests a lack of finality, an uncertainty or fallibility that can be exploited. This characteristic enables deniers to suggest that findings are not to be trusted because "the jury is still out."

Without first understanding the underlying dynamic, efforts to stop science denial are "doomed to an endless game of political whack-a-mole," according to Robert P. Crease. The traditional approaches to countering denial – denouncing individuals, moralizing or creating exposés – do not work because they take aim at specific acts and not the underlying dynamic. The author provides some short- and long-term tactics that he believes to be more effective, including:

  • Demand responsibility through pledges. A well-crafted pledge can improve voters' ability to understand the motives of potential elected leaders. An example pledge could be: "I pledge to defend and maintain the scientific infrastructure of the country, and to let my decision-making be guided by the facts rather than ideology or financial interest."
  • Expose hypocrisy. Show how science deniers betray the values they claim to hold. Some examples are to use startling metaphors, i.e. to ask a politician: "Explain the moral difference between ISIS militants who attack cultural treasures and politicians who attack the scientific process."
  • Use comedy and ridicule: be scathing, provocative and inflammatory. Comedy is often an effective way to reveal cognitive dissonance or hypocrisy because comedians have the license to be inappropriate and can deliver uncomfortable truths.
  • Tell parables: use metaphors and fables.A parable is a real or fictional story with a lesson that is easy to understand. Provocative metaphors could compare climate deniers to leeches or viruses, showing more viscerally how they live off the world without contributing to it.
  • Make saddle burrs. Continue to act in the public space, stubbornly repeating the messages and generally making life difficult and uncomfortable for science deniers.
  • Recall and retell. Find opportunities to tell stories of past action, about the successes and failures of science to renew the position of science as an authority, not a political cause.
  • Address current events. Take advantage of any current event and present a science or technology-oriented angle.

Readers curious to learn more on this subject might also be interested in Nathaniel Rich's Losing Earth, which explores the climate change misinformation campaign launched by the oil industry in the 1980s. Rich recently sat down for an interview with NPR.

Filed under Nature and the Environment

Article by Chris Fredrick

This article relates to The Workshop and the World. It first ran in the April 3, 2019 issue of BookBrowse Recommends.

This review is available to non-members for a limited time. For full access become a member today.
Membership Advantages
  • Reviews
  • "Beyond the Book" articles
  • Free books to read and review (US only)
  • Find books by time period, setting & theme
  • Read-alike suggestions by book and author
  • Book club discussions
  • and much more!
  • Just $39 for 12 months or $12 for 3 months.
  • More about membership!

Join BookBrowse

and discover exceptional books
for just $3.25 per month.

Find out more

Top Picks

  • Book Jacket: We Had to Remove This Post
    We Had to Remove This Post
    by Hanna Bervoets
    It's not about money. Kayleigh, the protagonist and narrator of We Had to Remove This Post, a newly ...
  • Book Jacket: River of the Gods
    River of the Gods
    by Candice Millard
    The Nile River has provided vital resources for millennia, serving as a source of water, food and ...
  • Book Jacket: Horse
    by Geraldine Brooks
    Geraldine Brooks creates a powerful backstory for 19th-century thoroughbred racehorse Lexington, ...
  • Book Jacket: Notes on Your Sudden Disappearance
    Notes on Your Sudden Disappearance
    by Alison Espach
    Notes on Your Sudden Disappearance will make you ache for a loss you didn't experience as you relate...

Book Club Discussion

Book Jacket
by Maggie O'Farrell
"Of all the stories...about Shakespeare’s life, [Hamnet] is so gorgeously written that it transports you."
The Boston Globe

Members Recommend

  • Book Jacket

    One's Company
    by Ashley Hutson

    For readers of Ottessa Moshfegh this fearless debut chronicles one woman's escape into a world of obsessive imagination.

  • Book Jacket

    Jackie & Me
    by Louis Bayard

    Master storyteller Louis Bayard delivers a surprising portrait of a young Jackie Kennedy as we've never seen her before.

Win This Book!
Win Where the Crawdads Sing

Win a signed copy of Where the Crawdads Sing

In celebration of the movie release on July 15, we have three signed copies to give away.



Solve this clue:

T O Thing W H T F I F I

and be entered to win..

Books that     

 & enlighten

Visitors can view some of BookBrowse for free. Full access is for members only.

Join Today!

Your guide toexceptional          books

BookBrowse seeks out and recommends the best in contemporary fiction and nonfiction—books that not only engage and entertain but also deepen our understanding of ourselves and the world around us.