Who is culpable for Genus Jackson's death? Are they all equally guilty?
Created: 07/11/18
Replies: 18
Join Date: 10/15/10
Posts: 3442
Join Date: 03/13/12
Posts: 564
Yes, there is a lot of guilt because the citizens had a code of silence about White crimes against Blacks. There is a technical difference between being a bystander who is cheering for the deed and the person wielding the murder weapon, but it is equally disgusting and unacceptable.
Join Date: 10/16/10
Posts: 1160
What a terrible thing this was. So many people played a part, and I think many were culpable. In my opinion, though, this was mostly orchestrated by Juke, and he bore the most responsibility. There were a lot o ways they could have explained Wilson, but Juke chose to be vindictive and have Genus killed.
Join Date: 02/08/16
Posts: 537
The mores of the day made it acceptable to take crime into one's own hands, or the mo's hands. Juke wanted an excuse for the black child, Wilson. Rape was the excuse he used. None of those that participated were innocent, but Juke was probably the instigator.
Join Date: 06/13/11
Posts: 272
Yes, they are all guilty, those who acted and those who stood by. It was not that unusual for the time and place. Other books speak of the lynchings and just this week we read of more study of the death of Emmitt Till, a more recent event. It is interesting how often the treatment of women is part of a bigger picture, no matter the time or place.
Join Date: 06/19/12
Posts: 413
Juke was the instigator, but he had plenty of help, most obviously from Freddie. Elma could have spoken up, but chose not to. The crowd of neighbors who participated were acting in the spirit of the the times, but that does not absolve them of their participation. I think attitudes toward women and toward race, held by almost every character in the book, placed a key role here.
Join Date: 01/01/16
Posts: 476
Join Date: 02/06/17
Posts: 466
I almost want to say that by giving the little nod of her head, Elma was culpable. She had all the power, right there, to end this horrible crime before it even happened. And she didn't. I realize things were much different for women then, but Elma didn't strike me as the kind of person who really cared what the rest of the town seemed to think about her. She chose to protect her father- -to save face- -over what was right.
After Elma set things in motion, every single man (including Juke and Freddie) who searched for Genus, watched as Juke tied him to the gourd tree and hanged him, hooted, hollered, allowed Freddie to tie him to the back of the truck, chased the truck into town, saw the truck driving through town, took a piece of clothing (or a part of Genus' body), and left Genus laying in a mangled heap at the mill was equally guilty. And what really makes me the angriest about all this is the fact that most of those men probably went to church the very next Sunday.
Join Date: 04/03/17
Posts: 40
Society then and sometimes now. Scapegoats are rampant, no matter the time or the issue. I think there are more scapegoats in the age of the internet. Folks play on other’s feelings and ignorance to swing attention or satisfy an urge.
Join Date: 04/21/11
Posts: 338
I think in some way they were all guilty. But it was also the times. To many white people in the south in the 1930’s black people were still considered the lowest kind of people. As a result many black people took the blame to ease the guilty, and lost their lives. And many other people looked the other way
Join Date: 08/29/13
Posts: 102
Join Date: 05/08/11
Posts: 113
I think they were all guilty. Elma for nodding her head, Juke and Freddie for carrying out the act, the others for helping and/or standing by doing nothing. It reminds me of Kitty Genovese and all those who heard her scream and saw her beaten and did nothing. Guilty all.
Join Date: 08/30/14
Posts: 265
Join Date: 02/05/16
Posts: 381
All the men present, and it seems eventually that included most men of the town in one way or another, were guilty as partipants or spectators or as willing to cover it up. It doesn’t matter who started it, Juke or Freddie. Elma certainly felt guilty —but I don’t think she was. I think many comments here have been too harsh. For two reasons: nothing she did or didn’t say would have changed the outcome — these men were bent on the lynching. And while she didn’t challenge her father’s lie, partly to protect her father, I think her larger motivation was fear. Her father had forced her and Nan into a small jail for months before they gave birth. He had the power to hurt them both, they knew what he was capable of. They had nowhere to go, no means of escape or support. And they had just given birth. No time to recover, to get stronger, to work out an alternative. I think we can’t fault Elma for lacking courage to stand up against angry men and the whole system of violent suppression of women and blacks, when it would have threatened her own survival and the babies— and when no man would stand up against his peers.
Elma does her best later to challenge the injustice indirectly by taking steps to help herself and especially Nan
to escape, by means of marriage. She lets her father know how angry she was, once he can’t hurt her. In the end, she refuses to protect him from Wilson’s gun.
Join Date: 01/23/15
Posts: 237
Join Date: 10/12/11
Posts: 256
Join Date: 05/11/15
Posts: 100
Equally guilty? Hard to say. Elma certainly bears some responsibility for nodding her head and not speaking up, but as a woman dependent on her father, rejected by the father of her child, and living in those times, it is understandable if not forgivable. Juke, certainly! Freddie Wilson, too, and all of the crowd that participated. I recently read On the Courthouse Lawn, by Sherrilyn Ifill, about lynching - horrifying to know about all the people who cheered on lynching. A very very sorry part of our history. I just hope it's in our past and won't happen again.
Join Date: 06/26/18
Posts: 34
Join Date: 03/29/16
Posts: 443
Anyone not trying to stop a crime like this is guilty. The whole crowd is culpable. Jake and Freddie were the ring leaders, but everyone involved, including the sheriff for not trying to get to the bottom of this, was responsible. This again was a sign of the 'evil' times. White on black crimes were abundant and nothing was done about it.
Reply
Please login to post a response.