What do readers think of The First Affair by Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus? Write your own review.

I was really looking forward to reading this book since I enjoyed The Nanny Dairies by the same authors, Emma McLaughlin and Nicola Kraus. But as someone else mentioned, with a change of names, you have the Monica Lewansky story all over again. The subject was painful to me then and reading the book was equally painful. I kept asking myself how Jamie could fall so deeply in love in such a short time and imagine a future together with so little commitment on Greg's part. You had to read a lot more into the affair than was evident within it's pages. It was interesting to see the impact this affair and the outcome played on family members and others connected with the story. I hadn't considered that previously. Basically I'm just wondering why we had to rehash this painful topic once again.

I would like to give this book two ratings – one rating for Part 1 of the book and a different rating for the remainder. I have no idea how the two authors collaborated on writing the book (and this most likely has nothing to do with my problem) but it seemed to me as if a different writer took over midway through it.

My rating for the first half would be a 1- (a one minus). I had a very hard time getting used to the combination of the writing style and the vocabulary. The vocabulary may have been a generational thing – this story was about the experiences of a current day young college graduate on her very first job (named Jamie) while I am a female 79 year old enjoying retirement at an independent living facility. I am not completely an out-of –touch old coot but my tastes in most everything are probably miles away from Jamie’s. Nevertheless, there were too many references in the book to things like “airnb sublets” or “the Bianca of Washington” – does it date me to admit I had to check out what these meant by going on-line? Also, there were too many sentences where I finally did figure out what was meant, but it is distracting when you have to think about it before going on.

My rating for the last part of the book would be a 3.5 or even a 4. While I had to push myself to continue reading the first part; I actually enjoyed the last part of the book. I was intrigued by the mystery of who the whistle blower was and whether Jamie would finally begin to tell the truth. Her loyalty deserves a halo but her lack of common sense was ridiculous.

I am not sure how the public will accept the very obvious connection between this story and the Monica Lewinsky affair. It did not bother me and I smiled ever so often recognizing the obvious twists in the story to keep us thinking about the Lewinsky and Clinton affair complete with the blue dress on the cover. As I read it, I wondered whether the variations in the story which departed from that well publicized affair were intentional or whether there were many things that seemed to be entirely the fictional imagination of the writer but were actually unknown parts of Monica’s situation. Of course, there were sufficient differences to make it in the end a fictional story of its own making.

My final comment is that I do not believe I would recommend this book to others. I must admit that it does not depart from how it was described by the publisher so I got just what I asked for when I signed up to read it and I also am not sorry that I took the time to finish reading it, but it was not a memorable read and does not reach anywhere near the level of good writing or excellent plot that I require before recommending a book to a friend. I would rate it as equivalent to one of the Harlequin Romance books I read years and years ago as I entered menopause and needed a boost.

Yes, it's the tired old story we've all heard before ... BUT ... what I found interesting as the story unfolded was the authors' attentiveness to all the side stories. It's hard to feel sympathy for what is admittedly a stupid act on the part of both main characters, but the ripple effect to friends, family, acquaintances as the story unfolds is quite interesting, and IS perhaps a tale that hasn't been fully examined before. Admittedly, some of the people draw themselves into the story for their own greedy reasons, but some people get drawn into the vortex in totally unexpected ways. I thought it was a sad look at what one sad lustful evening can do to the rest of your life as well as the lives of others. It was a quick read -- finished it in about four hours - but I have to say I enjoyed the ability of the writers to hold my attention with this new perspective on an old story.

This book is a story we've heard many times, but with a different slant. To me, it is a cross between the Kennedy "affairs" and the Clinton fiasco. I found it very difficult to empathize with any of the characters, as they stumbled and lied their way through the book. The main character, Jamie McAllister is another product of a totally dysfunctional family. Her affair with the President, Gregory Rutland, is textbook disaster. It is an easy read and probably best suited for the beach. I would not recommend it to my book club as there is very little to discuss that we haven't already read about in the tabloids many times.

I was extremely disappointed with The First Affair. I should have expected chick lit given the authors' previous books and the subject matter, but I was hoping for a fresh approach to a rehash of this distasteful subject. I thought the dialogue in the beginning of the book tried too hard to be hip and witty. I was bewildered by the protagonist's never seeming to be starstruck at obtaining a White House internship - she was always looking beyond it without ever seeming to revel in the honor for a moment. The author made clear she had debts to repay, therefore explaining the need for a paying job, but really ... not to just wallow in the honor of the internship for a little bit! I thought the unraveling of the truth at the end was a bit much - who should she not have trusted? Speaking of that, she told so many people of the so-called affair - surely someone in that position would have more sense? I didn't think the President's character was developed as much as it should have been - I didn't get a good sense of him as a person. I kept picturing Fitz from TV's Scandal and would then shake that image out of my mind. This President was no Fitz. I would not recommend this book to anyone.

This is a very quick read and I read this chick-lit book in several hours. I generally enjoy some chick-lit novels but this one was somewhat disturbing to me. It's a story about a fictional young White House female Intern who is tempted initially by the president to start an affair with him but falls in love with him. I'm sure this book will sell well as many readers will be enticed by the subject. But it's actually fictional, (which must be stressed) The intern is a product of the authors' imaginations and is portrayed quite sympathetically. The president is a less convincing character in this novel. His motivations don't quite ring true to me. The style of the authors' prose is "contemporary slick" and filled with "clever" turns of words in the style of previous books written by Emma McLaughlin and Nicola Kraus (one was "the Nanny Diaries") which was a best seller and which I enjoyed much more than this book. It's probably because I was a bit disturbed by the topic since it the authors based the novel on a scandalous, painful, sensational and demeaning true event.

Change the names and some minor details and it's the Monica Lewinsky story. I have no problem with the idea, but the authors weren't very creative, in my opinion. You could google all the media from the Clinton period and you'd basically have the story. They could have been more original in their storytelling. What a disappointment. I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone.