Compare Rosalind's experiences in France to her experiences in England. What was the biggest difference you noticed between each culture's expectations for scientists and women?

Compare Rosalind's experiences in France to her experiences in England. What was the biggest difference you noticed between each culture's expectations for scientists and women?

I was totally surprised of the role of women in science in France. I am thinking that the war helped with that because women took roles in defense of the country and also because of women like Marie Curie that paved the way. I felt badly that the U.S. wasn't more of a front runner in equality for women.

I'm with Navy Mom in being surprised that France was so much better at accepting women scientists in their ranks. I agree that it was likely due to the war, but in addition to the fact that women helped defend the country, I imagine the war left France with many fewer men, thereby creating more openings for women.

Rosalind enjoyed the camaraderie she experienced in Paris in the lab because she was accepted as an equal and was included in the social events. She did not feel that she was a "token" woman. She was admired for her talent and knowledge.
In London, she was the ostracized woman. She was not included in the "men's" lunches and therefore did not have the advantage of sharing ideas.
The London men conspired against her, stole her data, took advantage of her naivete.

I was very surprised at how much more accepting the French were of women in science.

I was initially surprised at the difference. After giving some thought to the question posed, I agree that the war and the difference between the two countries caused by the occupation and the societal differences it’s not so surprising. Great Britain was slow to recognize the value of women particularly in their value in the war. There was a great deal of resistance to using women in code breaking and as spies due to years of cultural and societal roles. The French were far more open minded by comparison, in my opinion

In England her voice was unheard many times and it was a rigid culture ie follow the rules. In France it was collaborative and a more open atmosphere in which to work.

France viewed women scientists on the same level as men. I believe that the difference in culture between France and Englands' view of womens' place in society had a great deal to do with it and Frances'Marie Curie led the way for future female scientists.

It seems that in France, it didn't matter so much if you were male or female. If you were a good scientist and researcher, there was a place for you. In England, it seemed that things were more competitive, and at least in some of the organizations more of a good old boys club.