If there were six Mitford sisters and one brother, why was the focus on just 3 sisters? Surely, Nancy could have gone to one of them for advice about Diana's betrayal.
Created: 01/16/23
Replies: 12
Join Date: 08/12/15
Posts: 167
Join Date: 01/14/15
Posts: 78
If the author widened her focus beyond the three sisters, she would have had a Game of Thrones-like narrative to contend with. Hodor!
By focusing on the three, the author is able to streamline plot and character interactions. The remaining sisters and Tom become somewhat composite. We have individuating mentions of them, but they do not confuse the narrative.
Join Date: 06/11/11
Posts: 44
Join Date: 06/01/11
Posts: 73
Join Date: 04/21/11
Posts: 324
Join Date: 05/26/22
Posts: 83
Join Date: 02/18/15
Posts: 497
I believe the three sisters that the author selected were of the appropriate age for the plot. They were what would have been "coming of age", finishing school and interested in world affairs. Each one would have been making their decisions on what they felt was the correct political government for Great Britain. They were also now becoming aware of how politics would play a part in how their lives would be financially affected.
Join Date: 07/28/16
Posts: 54
Join Date: 04/07/12
Posts: 265
Join Date: 02/22/21
Posts: 99
The three sisters were the most divergent in their points of view and were proactive in their beliefs, taking steps to act, while the remaining family members followed. However, I would have liked to know more directly from Jessica/Decca, representing the Communist role in England at the time; yet, I also realize that would have made the story more fragmented.
Join Date: 06/25/13
Posts: 347
Join Date: 04/14/11
Posts: 201
Join Date: 05/04/15
Posts: 35
Reply
Please login to post a response.