There are places in the book where I had trouble believing what happens is physically possiible, especially near the end. And there's a glaring error about basic bird biology. Did that bother anyone else?
Created: 08/06/21
Replies: 9
Join Date: 08/06/21
Posts: 15
Join Date: 10/19/20
Posts: 50
I found that this book lent itself really well to a suspension of disbelief when needed. Even though it's obviously based in reality, a lot of it felt very deliberately heightened in a way where I felt that a few 'unrealistic' moments were intentional choices on the author's part rather than errors.
Join Date: 08/06/21
Posts: 15
I wondered about whether or not the improbabilities were meant to be in Frannie's mind - a story she told herself about what happened. After all, she has told herself her mother ran away and she's looking for her, which we find out isn't so. Maybe some of the events at the end are things she has to believe as well?
Join Date: 07/03/18
Posts: 110
Join Date: 04/26/14
Posts: 56
Join Date: 08/06/21
Posts: 15
Join Date: 03/25/17
Posts: 189
Join Date: 08/29/11
Posts: 61
Join Date: 08/31/18
Posts: 32
Join Date: 10/01/20
Posts: 25
I can readily accept a bit of bird misinformation because we've all heard that touching a baby animal will cause its mother to abandon it. But learning about the terns far outweighed any minor inconsistency. We know that Franny is a bit of an unbelievable narrator since she hides truth even from herself. What was hard for me to believe was her survival in all of those submergings in freezing water.
Reply
Please login to post a response.