BOOK SUMMARY
From
one of the leading literary figures of our time, a gripping international tale
of love and revenge, and the ancient and modern conflicts from which they
spring.
Los Angeles, 1991. Ambassador Maximilian Ophuls, one of the makers of the modern
world, is murdered in broad daylight on his illegitimate daughter India's
doorstep, slaughtered by a knife wielded by his Kashmiri Muslim driver, a
mysterious figure who calls himself Shalimar the clown. The dead man is a
charismatic World War Two Resistance hero, a man of formidable intellectual
ability, a former US ambassador to India and subsequently America's
counter-terrorism chief. The murder looks at first like a political
assassination, but turns out to be passionately personal.
This is the story of Max Ophuls, his killer and his daughter and of a fourth
character, the woman who links them, whose story finally explains them all. It
is an epic narrative that moves from California to Kashmir, from Nazi-occupied
Europe to the world of modern terrorism. Along the way there is kindness, and
magic capable of producing miracles; there is also war ugly, unavoidable and
seemingly interminable. And there is always love, gained and lost, uncommonly
beautiful and mortally dangerous.
Everything is unsettled. Everything is connected. Lives are uprooted, names keep
changing nothing is permanent. The story of anywhere is also the story of
everywhere else. Spanning the globe and darting through history, Rushdie's
narrative captures the heart of the reader and the spirit of a troubled age.
Author statement
'It seems to me, more and more, that the fictional project on which I've been
involved ever since I began Midnight's Children back in 1975 is one of
self-definition. That novel, Shame and The Satanic Verses strike
me as an attempt to come to terms with the various component parts of myself -
countries, memories, histories, families, gods. First the writer invents the
books; then, perhaps, the books invent the writer.
But whenever I say anything about my work I want to contradict myself at once.
To say that beyond self-exploration lies a sense of writing as sacrament, and
maybe that's closer to how I feel: that writing fills the hole left by the
departure of God.
But, again, I love story, and comedy, and dreams. And newness: the novel, as its
name suggests, is about the making of the new.
None of this is quite true; all of it is true enough.'
|